New to RedHanded? About our sections.
Archive
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
Get your copy of Programming Ruby!
Links
@technorati@del.icio.us
@flickr
@artima
@caboo
@oreilly
ruby
-> docs
-> wares
-> wiki
-> forum
-> quizzes
-> planet
-> irc
rubyweeklynews
rails
-> wiki
-> planet
-> irc
%anarchaia
%projectionist
~audreyt
~black
~britt
~buck
~copeland
~fernandez
~fowler
~hansson
~hodel
~hoy/7
~hwang
~luetke
~matz
~mental
~olson
~pragdave
~premshree
~neukirchen
~robby
~rousette
~topfunky
~voorhis
~weirich
~zenspider
Syndicate
Built upon Hobix
Got a story for us? E-mail it!
Frodo
They seem to have stolen the logo. Very creative.
David
Heh. It’s funny how such a simple sentence can be so contradictory. Rails is Rails because all the layers were created from scratch and made to work together. Compiling a stack from existing components is a fine and noble venture. It doesn’t have anything to do with Rails, though.
flgr
But don’t they have to change that beautiful gem to an ugly snake?
Robert McGovern
Well they change the track to be the ugly snake, looks more like a dragon now though
Daniel Berger
I’d recommend copyrighting that image. It wasn’t exactly free ya know.
why
The image is a parody. Gently now.
flgr
Oh, I thought it was them who did it.
__Maad__
I thought ruby is the only language around that really has the proper language features to achieve what Rails achieves with minimal hassle? Is the python effort doomed to this end?
gabriele
I won’t say it is doomed. I can’t think of a thing wich is doable in ruby wich is extremely harder in python. If you look at the cherrypy2 it is somewhat railish.
But the python web stuff is gone all on another side with lots of interfaces and overengineering, so I think it is still doomed.
phil
Had me worried there for a second that they hijacked the Rails logo. I second the call to copyright as the Rails folks paid good money for it.
Maybe a better parody logo would be a snake across the rails that’s been cut up by the passing train?
gab
sorry for the bold comment, did’nt meant to have it that way..
zoolander
any language that doesn’t enforce whitespace rules can’t be real ;-)
I’ve been writing web apps in python for a number of years and must admit was intrigued by the Rails demo, however I see no compelling reason to switch to Ruby, nor any particular feature in Rails which I have not already built myself or adapted from other Python projects. The reaction you are seeing from (some) of the Python community is partly understandable – Rails seems to be giving Ruby traction it did not appear to have before, and there is no doubt some desire to translate that inso a similar success story with a Python project. Whether that will happen or not, I do not know nor care. I quite like having a number of web framework choices. I don’t like “asp-like” templating languages. I use a simple, understandable, well-thought out framework called Quixote and either ZODB or Durus object databases or any common SQL database with SQL Object or one of several other useful ORMs.
The comment “with lots of interfaces and overengineering” might mean Zope or some other tool sets, but certainly does not apply to all Python web development tools or frameworks.
cheers
Comments are closed for this entry.